NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday posted petitions challenging the constitutionality of Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, for hearing before a bench headed by CJI-designate B R Gavai on May 15, a day by which Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna would have retired. CJI Khanna said even for passing interim order, it requires a lengthy hearing.
CJI Khanna-led bench said the Centre has raised some points on registration of waqf properties which would require detailed consideration by the court. "I do not want to reserve any judgment, or even interim order, at this stage," said CJI Khanna, who retires on May 13.
"I don't have to reserve any judgment or order at the interim stage. This matter will have to be heard on a reasonably early date, and this will not be before me. If you all agree, we post it before a bench of Justice Gavai," CJI Khanna said, as reported by LiveLaw.
Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, along with solicitor general Tushar Mehta, agreed to the suggestion made by the CJI.
The three-judge bench of CJI Sanjiv Khanna, J Sanjay Kumar & J KV Viswanathan was hearing on Monday the batch of five petitions which are now titled In Re the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 and other related fresh pleas on the issue. The batch of pleas include the one filed by AIMIM chief and Hyderabad MP Asadudding Owaisi.
This comes weeks after the government paused two central aspects of the contentious law in the face of probing questions by the top court. The Centre assured the apex court on April 17 that it would neither denotify waqf properties, including "waqf by user", nor make any appointments to the Central Waqf Council and boards till May 5.
Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing for Centre, had made the assurance in April 17 hearing while informing the Supreme Court that the law, passed by Parliament with "due deliberations", should not be stayed without hearing the government.
The Centre had also strongly opposed the apex court's proposal to pass an interim order against the denotification of Waqf properties, including 'waqf by user', aside from staying a provision allowing the inclusion of non-Muslims in the Central Waqf Council and boards.
The top court had noted the submissions of Mehta and said that waqf properties, including 'waqf by user', already registered or declared by way of notification, shall not be disturbed and denotified till the next date of hearing.
It had then granted a week's time to the Centre to file a preliminary response to the pleas challenging the validity of the law and posted the matter on May 5.
In its affidavit on April 25, the Centre defended the amended Act and opposed any "blanket stay" by the court on a "law having presumption of constitutionality passed by Parliament". Justifying a provision on "waqf by user" properties, it said any interference would create a "legislative regime by a judicial order".
Waqf by user refers to a practice where a property is recognised as a religious or charitable endowment (waqf) based on its long-term, uninterrupted use for such purposes, even if there isn't a formal and written declaration of waqf by the owner.
In a 1,332-page preliminary counter-affidavit, the ministry of minority affairs referred to the provisions of the old waqf laws and said the registration of waqf properties, including 'waqf by user', has been mandatory since 1923.
The government, in its affidavit, said the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, respects the essential religious practices of Muslims by leaving matters of faith and worship "untouched".
It had claimed an addition of 20 lakh acre of waqf land post the law's 2013 amendment and flagged "misuse" of waqf provisions to encroach upon private and government properties.
The Centre urged the apex court to dismiss the pleas against the Waqf (Amendment) Act and termed it "really shocking" that there was a 116 per cent rise in the Waqf area after the 2013 amendment.
"Right before even the Mughal era, pre-Independence era and post-Independence era, the total of wakfs created was 18,29,163.896 acres of land in India," it had claimed, adding, "Shockingly, after 2013, the addition of wakf land is 20,92,072.536 acres."
The affidavit claimed the figures were voluntarily uploaded by the respective waqfs and waqf boards on the Waqf Management System of India portal.
It argued, "Despite there being a regime of mandatory registration of all kinds of waqf including 'waqf by user' making registration mandatory almost since a century, i.e. since 1923, individuals or organisations used to claim private lands and government lands as waqf including under 'waqf by user' which not only lead to deprivation of valuable property rights of individual citizens but similarly unauthorised claims over public properties."
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), a prominent Muslim body has accused the Centre of submitting incorrect data in the top court and sought action against the officer concerned for filing a "false affidavit".
The board has expressed serious objections to the statement made by the government that there has been a "shocking increase" in the number of Waqf properties uploaded in the central portal after 2013.
The top court recently refused to entertain any fresh plea against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, saying it had already been made clear that the court would hear only five of the over 70 litigants on the issue.
The Centre notified the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 last month after it got President Droupadi Murmu's assent on April 5. The Bill was cleared by the Lok Sabha with the support of 288 members while 232 MPs were against it. The Rajya Sabha saw 128 members voting in its favour and 95 against it.
Several political parties such as the DMK, YSRCP, AIMIM, the Left parties, civil society groups such as NGOs, Muslim bodies and others have moved the apex court challenging the validity of the Act.
CJI Khanna-led bench said the Centre has raised some points on registration of waqf properties which would require detailed consideration by the court. "I do not want to reserve any judgment, or even interim order, at this stage," said CJI Khanna, who retires on May 13.
"I don't have to reserve any judgment or order at the interim stage. This matter will have to be heard on a reasonably early date, and this will not be before me. If you all agree, we post it before a bench of Justice Gavai," CJI Khanna said, as reported by LiveLaw.
Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, along with solicitor general Tushar Mehta, agreed to the suggestion made by the CJI.
The three-judge bench of CJI Sanjiv Khanna, J Sanjay Kumar & J KV Viswanathan was hearing on Monday the batch of five petitions which are now titled In Re the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 and other related fresh pleas on the issue. The batch of pleas include the one filed by AIMIM chief and Hyderabad MP Asadudding Owaisi.
This comes weeks after the government paused two central aspects of the contentious law in the face of probing questions by the top court. The Centre assured the apex court on April 17 that it would neither denotify waqf properties, including "waqf by user", nor make any appointments to the Central Waqf Council and boards till May 5.
Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing for Centre, had made the assurance in April 17 hearing while informing the Supreme Court that the law, passed by Parliament with "due deliberations", should not be stayed without hearing the government.
The Centre had also strongly opposed the apex court's proposal to pass an interim order against the denotification of Waqf properties, including 'waqf by user', aside from staying a provision allowing the inclusion of non-Muslims in the Central Waqf Council and boards.
The top court had noted the submissions of Mehta and said that waqf properties, including 'waqf by user', already registered or declared by way of notification, shall not be disturbed and denotified till the next date of hearing.
It had then granted a week's time to the Centre to file a preliminary response to the pleas challenging the validity of the law and posted the matter on May 5.
In its affidavit on April 25, the Centre defended the amended Act and opposed any "blanket stay" by the court on a "law having presumption of constitutionality passed by Parliament". Justifying a provision on "waqf by user" properties, it said any interference would create a "legislative regime by a judicial order".
Waqf by user refers to a practice where a property is recognised as a religious or charitable endowment (waqf) based on its long-term, uninterrupted use for such purposes, even if there isn't a formal and written declaration of waqf by the owner.
In a 1,332-page preliminary counter-affidavit, the ministry of minority affairs referred to the provisions of the old waqf laws and said the registration of waqf properties, including 'waqf by user', has been mandatory since 1923.
The government, in its affidavit, said the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, respects the essential religious practices of Muslims by leaving matters of faith and worship "untouched".
It had claimed an addition of 20 lakh acre of waqf land post the law's 2013 amendment and flagged "misuse" of waqf provisions to encroach upon private and government properties.
The Centre urged the apex court to dismiss the pleas against the Waqf (Amendment) Act and termed it "really shocking" that there was a 116 per cent rise in the Waqf area after the 2013 amendment.
"Right before even the Mughal era, pre-Independence era and post-Independence era, the total of wakfs created was 18,29,163.896 acres of land in India," it had claimed, adding, "Shockingly, after 2013, the addition of wakf land is 20,92,072.536 acres."
The affidavit claimed the figures were voluntarily uploaded by the respective waqfs and waqf boards on the Waqf Management System of India portal.
It argued, "Despite there being a regime of mandatory registration of all kinds of waqf including 'waqf by user' making registration mandatory almost since a century, i.e. since 1923, individuals or organisations used to claim private lands and government lands as waqf including under 'waqf by user' which not only lead to deprivation of valuable property rights of individual citizens but similarly unauthorised claims over public properties."
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), a prominent Muslim body has accused the Centre of submitting incorrect data in the top court and sought action against the officer concerned for filing a "false affidavit".
The board has expressed serious objections to the statement made by the government that there has been a "shocking increase" in the number of Waqf properties uploaded in the central portal after 2013.
The top court recently refused to entertain any fresh plea against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, saying it had already been made clear that the court would hear only five of the over 70 litigants on the issue.
The Centre notified the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 last month after it got President Droupadi Murmu's assent on April 5. The Bill was cleared by the Lok Sabha with the support of 288 members while 232 MPs were against it. The Rajya Sabha saw 128 members voting in its favour and 95 against it.
Several political parties such as the DMK, YSRCP, AIMIM, the Left parties, civil society groups such as NGOs, Muslim bodies and others have moved the apex court challenging the validity of the Act.
You may also like
Top 5 news of the day: Mamata blames Centre for Murshidabad violence; Putin dials PM Modi, backs India on terror, and more
Congress leader KC Venugopal re-appointed as PAC chairperson
MK Stalin presents royalties to five Tamil scholars
Tourist left screaming until he passed out after taking Rome Colosseum selfie
Russian President Vladimir Putin Accepts PM Modi's Invitation To Visit India For Annual High-Level Meeting
